CONSERVATION CONGRESS v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, 2:151-cv-0249-WBS-AC. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20150519754
Visitors: 7
Filed: May 18, 2015
Latest Update: May 18, 2015
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM B. SHUBB , District Judge . Upon consideration of the Parties' Joint Motion to Amend the Case Management Schedule, and for good cause shown, the Court hereby orders the following. 1. The Court amends the current case management order. See Order (May 6, 2015), ECF No. 12. 2. The Court directs the Parties to use the following schedule for resolving this case: June 18, 2015 By this date, the Federal Defendants shall file an answer or other response to the Second Am
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM B. SHUBB , District Judge . Upon consideration of the Parties' Joint Motion to Amend the Case Management Schedule, and for good cause shown, the Court hereby orders the following. 1. The Court amends the current case management order. See Order (May 6, 2015), ECF No. 12. 2. The Court directs the Parties to use the following schedule for resolving this case: June 18, 2015 By this date, the Federal Defendants shall file an answer or other response to the Second Ame..
More
ORDER
WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge.
Upon consideration of the Parties' Joint Motion to Amend the Case Management Schedule, and for good cause shown, the Court hereby orders the following.
1. The Court amends the current case management order. See Order (May 6, 2015), ECF No. 12.
2. The Court directs the Parties to use the following schedule for resolving this case:
June 18, 2015 By this date, the Federal Defendants shall file an answer or other
response to the Second Amended Complaint.
July 10, 2015 By this date, the Federal Defendants shall file their respective
administrative records.
Aug. 17, 2015 By this date, Conservation Congress shall file its motion for
summary judgment. The brief in support may not exceed thirty
pages (excluding the caption, tables, and signature block).
Sep. 17, 2015 By this date, Federal Defendants shall file their cross-motion for
summary judgment. The combined brief in support of the cross-motion
and response to Conservation Congress's motion may not
exceed thirty pages (excluding the caption, tables, and signature
block).
Oct. 1, 2015 By this date, Conservation Congress shall file one brief that
combines its reply in support of its motion for summary judgment
and its response to the Forest Service's cross-motion. That brief
may not exceed fifteen pages (excluding the caption, tables, and
signature block).
Oct. 15, 2015 By this date, the Federal Defendants shall file their reply in support
of its cross-motion for summary judgment. That brief may not
exceed fifteen pages (excluding the caption, tables, and signature
block).
Nov. 16, 2015 The Court will hear argument on cross-motions for summary
at 2:00 p.m. judgment.
Because this is an administrative record case, the Court relieve the parties of the requirements of Local Rule 260 to file statements of disputed and undisputed facts concerning their cross motions for summary judgment.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
