MOORE v. TANNER, 1:15-CV-00496-SAB. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20150601791
Visitors: 8
Filed: May 29, 2015
Latest Update: May 29, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT STANLEY A. BOONE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Ronald Moore and Defendants Christine L. Tanner, Jerry W. Tanner, Shazad Bhai dba Z's Smoke Shop, Hussain Kulsum dba Z's Smoke Shop, by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate to an extension of time so that Defendants shall have until June 30, 2015, to respond to the Complaint. Good cause exists for this extension because a Certified Access Spec
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT STANLEY A. BOONE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Ronald Moore and Defendants Christine L. Tanner, Jerry W. Tanner, Shazad Bhai dba Z's Smoke Shop, Hussain Kulsum dba Z's Smoke Shop, by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate to an extension of time so that Defendants shall have until June 30, 2015, to respond to the Complaint. Good cause exists for this extension because a Certified Access Speci..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT
STANLEY A. BOONE, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Ronald Moore and Defendants Christine L. Tanner, Jerry W. Tanner, Shazad Bhai dba Z's Smoke Shop, Hussain Kulsum dba Z's Smoke Shop, by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate to an extension of time so that Defendants shall have until June 30, 2015, to respond to the Complaint.
Good cause exists for this extension because a Certified Access Specialist inspected the property in question on May 15, 2015, and the parties are in the process of reviewing the CASp Inspection Report, evaluating the alleged access barriers set forth in Plaintiff's Complaint, and discussing the possibility of an informal, global resolution of this dispute without the time and expense of further litigation. In particular, permitting this extension of time to respond to the Complaint will allow Defendants avoid the cost of preparing a formal response to the Complaint if the parties are able to resolve this dispute prior to June 30, 2015.
In accordance with the foregoing, the stipulation of the parties is approved.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
