Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Ramirez, 2:11-cv-00190 MCE. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20150601822 Visitors: 11
Filed: May 29, 2015
Latest Update: May 29, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS; ORDER THEREON MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr. , Chief District Judge . Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and the defendant's herein, by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulates as follows: By previous order, this matter was set for status on May 27, 2015. By this stipulation, defendants now move to continue the status conference until July 30, 2015 and to exclude time between May 27, 2015, and July 30, 2015 und
More

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS; ORDER THEREON

Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and the defendant's herein, by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulates as follows:

By previous order, this matter was set for status on May 27, 2015.

By this stipulation, defendants now move to continue the status conference until July 30, 2015 and to exclude time between May 27, 2015, and July 30, 2015 under Local Code T4. Plaintiff does not oppose this request.

Counsel for defendants desire additional time to review documents and to consult with their clients in efforts to resolve this case.

The government does not object to the continuance.

Based on the above-stated findings, the ends of justice served by continuing the case as requested outweigh the interest of the public and the defendant in a trial within the original date prescribed by the Speedy Trial Act.

For the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, et seq., within which trial must commence, the time period of May 27, 2015 to July 30, 2015, inclusive, is deemed excludable pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), B(iv) [Local Code T4] because it results from a continuance granted by the Court at defendant's request on the basis of the Court's finding that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h).

Nothing in this stipulation and order shall preclude a finding that other provisions of the Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time periods are excludable from the period within which a trial must commence.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

In accordance with the foregoing stipulation, and good cause appearing therefor, the above referenced matter shall be continued for status hearing until July 30, 2015 at 9:00 a.m., with time excluded for the reasons set forth above.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer