LOVETT v. SKYWAY MACHINE INC., 2:12-cv-02163-TLN-CMK. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20150601827
Visitors: 1
Filed: May 28, 2015
Latest Update: May 28, 2015
Summary: ORDER TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . This matter is currently set for trial on August 3, 2015. However, due to a conflict with the Court's calendar, the Court hereby VACATES the trial date and the Final Pretrial Conference Hearing set for June 4, 2015. Thus, this matter must be reset for trial. However, the Court's docket cannot accommodate a trial until summer 2016. Therefore, the Court hereby orders the parties to meet and confer as to whether both parties are willing to attend a sett
Summary: ORDER TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . This matter is currently set for trial on August 3, 2015. However, due to a conflict with the Court's calendar, the Court hereby VACATES the trial date and the Final Pretrial Conference Hearing set for June 4, 2015. Thus, this matter must be reset for trial. However, the Court's docket cannot accommodate a trial until summer 2016. Therefore, the Court hereby orders the parties to meet and confer as to whether both parties are willing to attend a settl..
More
ORDER
TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.
This matter is currently set for trial on August 3, 2015. However, due to a conflict with the Court's calendar, the Court hereby VACATES the trial date and the Final Pretrial Conference Hearing set for June 4, 2015. Thus, this matter must be reset for trial. However, the Court's docket cannot accommodate a trial until summer 2016.
Therefore, the Court hereby orders the parties to meet and confer as to whether both parties are willing to attend a settlement conference before the magistrate judge and whether the parties are amenable to consenting to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge in order to have their trial concluded in a more timely matter. The parties are hereby ordered to file a joint statement with this Court within thirty (30) days of the entry of this order notifying the Court as to whether a settlement conference would be beneficial and whether they would like to consent to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
