ORDER

WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge.

Defendants request an award of expenses incurred to enforce this court's award of attorneys' fees and costs pursuant to California's Enforcement of Judgments Law, Cal. Civ. Proc. Code §§ 680.010, et seq. (Docket No. 223.) Plaintiff General Charles E. Yeager opposes the motion pro se. (Docket No. 228.)

The court understands defendants' motion to request fees and costs associated solely with the enforcement of the court's June 3, 2010 judgment. (See Defs.' Mem. at 3.) Defendants say that judgment "has been collected in full." (Id.; see also id. at 2 ("Yeager did pay Bowlins the balance of the underlying judgment. . . .").)

These statements suggest the instant motion may be untimely. See Cal. Civ. Proc. Code §§ 685.070(b) ("Before the judgment is fully satisfied but not later than two years after the costs have been incurred, the judgment creditor claiming costs under this section shall file a memorandum of costs. . . ."), 685.080(a) ("The motion shall be made before the judgment is satisfied in full, but not later than two years after the costs have been incurred."); see also Carnes v. Zamani, 488 F.3d 1057, 1059-61 (9th Cir. 2007) (affirming the denial of a similar motion as untimely). However, neither party discusses this issue in their briefing. In order to ensure a thorough adjudication of this matter involving a pro se party, the court will continue the hearing set for this motion and invites both parties to file supplemental briefs addressing the timeliness of defendants' motion.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: