Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

LaTOURELLE v. BARBER, 2:10-CV-2667 MCE CMK. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20150706911 Visitors: 11
Filed: Jul. 02, 2015
Latest Update: Jul. 02, 2015
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER REQUESTING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULES 270 AND 271 Trial MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr. , Chief District Judge . Defendants, TERRY BARBER and COUNTY OF SISKIYOU, and Plaintiff RUTH LaTOURELLE, through the undersigned counsel of record, hereby stipulate and request a settlement conference pursuant to Local Rules 270. SO STIPULATED: ORDER Based on the Joint Stipulation of the parties, this matter is hereby referred to the Court's Alternative Disput
More

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER REQUESTING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULES 270 AND 271 Trial

Defendants, TERRY BARBER and COUNTY OF SISKIYOU, and Plaintiff RUTH LaTOURELLE, through the undersigned counsel of record, hereby stipulate and request a settlement conference pursuant to Local Rules 270.

SO STIPULATED:

ORDER

Based on the Joint Stipulation of the parties, this matter is hereby referred to the Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution Division to schedule a settlement conference before a magistrate judge. The assigned magistrate judge will issue a scheduling order for the settlement conference, and counsel is instructed to have a principal with full settlement authority present at the conference or to be fully authorized to settle the matter on any terms. The parties are ordered to file status reports with this Court not later than seven days after the conclusion of the settlement conference.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer