Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Arcure v. California Department of Developmental Services, 1:13-cv-00541-MJS. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20150714628 Visitors: 3
Filed: Jul. 10, 2015
Latest Update: Jul. 10, 2015
Summary: STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL AND PROPOSED ORDER MICHAEL J. SENG , Magistrate Judge . NOW COME THE PARTIES HERETO to notify the Court that Yvonne Arcure and Joseph Fessenden have reached a settlement with all defendants in this case of the claims they have asserted herein and by which they have released any and all claims they may have had against the State of California, its employees, and its agents up to an through the date that settlement was reached, i.e. April 8, 2015. Pursuant to
More

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL AND PROPOSED ORDER

NOW COME THE PARTIES HERETO to notify the Court that Yvonne Arcure and Joseph Fessenden have reached a settlement with all defendants in this case of the claims they have asserted herein and by which they have released any and all claims they may have had against the State of California, its employees, and its agents up to an through the date that settlement was reached, i.e. April 8, 2015. Pursuant to the settlement agreement, each party is to bear their own costs and attorney's fees.

Accordingly, THE PARTIES HERETO hereby request that the Court dismiss with prejudice YVONNE ARCURE AND JOSEPH FESSENDEN'S claims in this case. Further, the parties request that Defendants Douglas Loehner and Michael Flores be dismissed with prejudice. This dismissal has no effect or legal impact on the claims of the remaining plaintiff, Kevin Cook.

ORDER

Having reviewed the parties stipulated request for dismissal of Yvonne Arcure and Joseph Fessenden's claims in Case No. 1:13-cv-00541-MJS and finding good cause therefore, the Court hereby dismisses with prejudice the claims that Plaintiffs Yvonne Arcure & Joseph Fessenden asserted in this case. Further, Defendants Douglas Loehner and Michael Flores are dismissed with prejudice. This dismissal has no effect or legal impact on the claims of the remaining plaintiff, Kevin Cook.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer