ANTHONY W. ISHII, Senior District Judge.
The United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendant Darling Arlette Montalvo, by and through her counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:
1. Defendant Darling Arlette Montalvo was sentenced by the Court on April 13, 2015, following conviction after a jury trial of one count of conspiracy to commit mail, wire and bank fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1349), ten counts of mail fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1341) and one count of money laundering and aiding and abetting (18 U.S.C. §§ 1957 and 2).
2. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3664(d)(5), a restitution hearing is currently set for July 27, 2015 at 10:00 a.m. to determine the restitution owed by defendant Montalvo. However, Ms. Montalvo was arrested on a separate matter in Washington state prior to her self-surrender date in the present case, and she is currently in custody on pending state charges in Washington. Due to her custody status, defense counsel has been unable to confirm whether Ms. Montalvo will waive her presence at the restitution hearing or whether she will stipulate as to the restitution owed. Accordingly, the parties jointly seek a six week continuance of the restitution hearing, to September 8, 2015, at 10:00 a.m. so that Ms. Montalvo can be brought before the court for the restitution hearing. The government has conferred with the Marshals Service regarding the time needed to obtain Ms. Montalvo's presence by writ, and the Marshals Service has indicated that six weeks should provide sufficient time to ensure Ms. Montalvo's presence before the court.
3. The agreed restitution hearing on September 8, 2015 will take place more than 90 days after the defendant's sentencing hearing. The parties agree that, pursuant to
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
The Court has previously ordered that defendant Darling Arlette Montalvo pay restitution, as restitution is mandatory pursuant to her convictions at trial for conspiracy, mail fraud, and money laundering, and 18 U.S.C. § 3663A(c)(1)(A)(ii). The remaining issue of the amount and apportionment of restitution shall be resolved at or before a restitution hearing on
IT IS SO ORDERED.