STARBUCKS CORPORATION v. AMCOR PACKAGING DISTRIBUTION, 2:13-1754 WBS CKD. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20150731664
Visitors: 12
Filed: Jul. 30, 2015
Latest Update: Jul. 30, 2015
Summary: ORDER CAROLYN K. DELANEY , Magistrate Judge . Third party defendant Ozburn-Hessey Logistics' motion to compel came on regularly for hearing on July 29, 2015. David Klein appeared for the third party defendant. Thomas Moses appeared for defendant and third party plaintiff Pallets Unlimited, LLC. Manish Parikh appeared for defendant Amcor Packaging. No appearance was made for plaintiff. Upon review of the documents in support and opposition, upon hearing the arguments of counsel, and good cau
Summary: ORDER CAROLYN K. DELANEY , Magistrate Judge . Third party defendant Ozburn-Hessey Logistics' motion to compel came on regularly for hearing on July 29, 2015. David Klein appeared for the third party defendant. Thomas Moses appeared for defendant and third party plaintiff Pallets Unlimited, LLC. Manish Parikh appeared for defendant Amcor Packaging. No appearance was made for plaintiff. Upon review of the documents in support and opposition, upon hearing the arguments of counsel, and good caus..
More
ORDER
CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge.
Third party defendant Ozburn-Hessey Logistics' motion to compel came on regularly for hearing on July 29, 2015. David Klein appeared for the third party defendant. Thomas Moses appeared for defendant and third party plaintiff Pallets Unlimited, LLC. Manish Parikh appeared for defendant Amcor Packaging. No appearance was made for plaintiff. Upon review of the documents in support and opposition, upon hearing the arguments of counsel, and good cause appearing therefor, THE COURT ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:
The motion to compel (ECF No. 64) is granted. Defendant shall provide further responses to the interrogatories, without objections, no later than August 12, 2015.
Source: Leagle
