Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

MAXEY v. JOHNSON, 2:15-cv-01656. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20150811720 Visitors: 10
Filed: Aug. 10, 2015
Latest Update: Aug. 10, 2015
Summary: ORDER DECLARING PLAINTIFF JAMES MAXEY A "VEXATIOUS LITIGANT" JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . Over a period of less than two years, Plaintiff James Maxey has filed 172 lawsuits in this Court. The vast majority of these cases have been summarily dismissed, due to Mr. Maxey's implausible allegations that, inter alia, he has been subjected to "satellite microchip implant technology" by various governmental actors. California Code of Civil Procedure ("CCP") 391 et seq. (as adopted in Local
More

ORDER DECLARING PLAINTIFF JAMES MAXEY A "VEXATIOUS LITIGANT"

Over a period of less than two years, Plaintiff James Maxey has filed 172 lawsuits in this Court. The vast majority of these cases have been summarily dismissed, due to Mr. Maxey's implausible allegations that, inter alia, he has been subjected to "satellite microchip implant technology" by various governmental actors.

California Code of Civil Procedure ("CCP") § 391 et seq. (as adopted in Local Rule 151(b)) provides that the Court "may, on its own motion . . . enter a prefiling order which prohibits a vexatious litigant from filing any new litigation [in this Court] in propria persona without first obtaining leave of the presiding. . . judge" of this Court. Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 391.7(a). As defined elsewhere in the CCP, a "vexatious litigant" is a person who, "[i]n the immediately preceding seven-year period has commenced, prosecuted, or maintained in propria persona at least five litigations other than in a small claims court that have been (i) finally determined adversely to the person or (ii) unjustifiably permitted to remain pending at least two years without having been brought to trial or hearing." Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 391(b)(1).

Based on a review of Mr. Maxey's filings on the Court's electronic filing database (CM-ECF), the Court concludes that Mr. Maxey meets the definition of a "vexatious litigant" under CCP § 391(b)(1), as well over 100 of his cases have been brought, and dismissed, within the past two years. Thus, pursuant to Local Rule 151(b) CCP § 391 et seq., the Court hereby designates James Maxey a "vexatious litigant."

This order constitutes a "prefiling order" as defined in CCP § 391.7, and will operate to prevent Mr. Maxey from filing any new litigation in this Court without first obtaining leave of Chief Judge Morrison England. Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 391.7(a). Pursuant to CCP § 391.7(b), any future filings by Mr. Maxey will only be permitted if "it appears that the litigation has merit and has not been filed for the purposes of harassment or delay." Pursuant to CCP § 391.7(c), the Clerk is directed to "not file any litigation presented by [Mr. Maxey] unless [he] first obtains an order from [Chief Judge England] permitting the filing." Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 391.7(c).

This order does not have retroactive effect, and Mr. Maxey's currently-pending actions will proceed accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer