Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

HARDESTY v. SACRAMENTO METROPOLITAN AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, 2:10-cv-2414-KJM-KJN (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20150819703 Visitors: 10
Filed: Aug. 18, 2015
Latest Update: Aug. 18, 2015
Summary: ORDER KIMBERLY J. MUELLER , District Judge . The plaintiffs and defendants in Case No. 10-2414, the Hardesty case, and Case No. 12-2457, the Schneider case, have each filed a joint status report and request to modify the scheduling order. See Defs.' Rep., ECF No. 213; Pls.' Rep., ECF No. 214. They request an order setting a schedule for the filing of a joint statement of undisputed facts and dispositive motions. Defendant David Bieber, the sole remaining defendant in Schneider et al.
More

ORDER

The plaintiffs and defendants in Case No. 10-2414, the Hardesty case, and Case No. 12-2457, the Schneider case, have each filed a joint status report and request to modify the scheduling order. See Defs.' Rep., ECF No. 213; Pls.' Rep., ECF No. 214. They request an order setting a schedule for the filing of a joint statement of undisputed facts and dispositive motions. Defendant David Bieber, the sole remaining defendant in Schneider et al. v. County of Sacramento, et al., No. 12-2457, requests exemption from any consolidated briefing schedule, a request the court DENIES.

Having considered the parties' reports, the court orders as follows:

(1) The parties shall compile a Statement of Undisputed Facts to be filed with the court no later than September 18, 2015, with no dispositive motions to be filed before this date;

(2) Dispositive motions shall be filed no later than October 16, 2015;

(3) Oppositions shall be filed no later than December 4, 2015;

(4) Replies shall be filed no later than December 30, 2015;

(5) The court anticipates a combined hearing in January 2016; and

(6) Defendants O'Bryant, Norris, Testa, and Taras may file a consolidated motion for summary judgment supported by a memorandum of point and authorities of up to sixty-five pages; the consolidated brief in opposition may likewise not exceed sixty-five pages, and the consolidated reply shall not exceed thirty-two pages.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer