Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. Munoz, 1:11-cr-00353-AWI-BAM-7. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20150821b08 Visitors: 9
Filed: Aug. 20, 2015
Latest Update: Aug. 20, 2015
Summary: STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER TO REDUCE SENTENCE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) RETROACTIVE DRUGS-MINUS-TWO REDUCTION CASE ANTHONY W. ISHII , Senior District Judge . Defendant, JOSE MUNOZ, by and through his attorney, Assistant Federal Defender HANNAH R. LABAREE, and plaintiff, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, by and through its counsel, Assistant U.S. Attorney Kathleen A. Servatius, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2), this Court may reduce the term of imprisonm
More

STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER TO REDUCE SENTENCE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

RETROACTIVE DRUGS-MINUS-TWO REDUCTION CASE

Defendant, JOSE MUNOZ, by and through his attorney, Assistant Federal Defender HANNAH R. LABAREE, and plaintiff, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, by and through its counsel, Assistant U.S. Attorney Kathleen A. Servatius, hereby stipulate as follows:

1. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), this Court may reduce the term of imprisonment in the case of a defendant who has been sentenced to a term of imprisonment based on a sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered by the Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 994(o);

2. On January 6, 2014 this Court sentenced Mr. Munoz to a term of 63 months imprisonment;

3. His total offense level was 25, his criminal history category was II, and the resulting guideline range was 63 to 78 months. As a result of the government's motion pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3553(e), Mr. Munoz was not subject to a mandatory minimum term of 120 months;

4. The sentencing range applicable to Mr. Munoz was subsequently lowered by the United States Sentencing Commission in Amendment 782, made retroactive on July 18, 2014, see 79 Fed. Reg. 44,973;and with an effective date of any such reduction as of November 1, 2015

5. Mr. Munoz' total offense level has been reduced from 25 to 23, and his amended guideline range is 51 to 63 months;

6. Accordingly, the parties request the Court enter the order lodged herewith reducing Mr. Munoz' term of imprisonment to 51 months, effective November 1, 2015, provided however, that if, as of November 1, 2015 (the effective date of this reduction), this sentence is less than the amount of time the defendant has already served, the sentence is reduced to a time served sentence.

ORDER

This matter came before the Court on the stipulated motion of the defendant for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2).

The parties agree, and the Court finds, that Mr. Munoz is entitled to the benefit Amendment 782, which reduces the total offense level from 25 to 23, resulting in an amended guideline range of 51 to 63 months.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the term of imprisonment imposed in January 6, 2014 is reduced to a term of 51 months, provided however, that if, as of November 1, 2015 (the effective date of this reduction), this sentence is less than the amount of time the defendant has already served, the sentence is reduced to a time served sentence.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all other terms and provisions of the original judgment remain in effect. The clerk shall forthwith prepare an amended judgment reflecting the above reduction in sentence, and shall serve certified copies of the amended judgment on the United States Bureau of Prisons and the United States Probation Office.

Unless otherwise ordered, Mr. Munoz shall report to the United States Probation Office within seventy-two hours after his release.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer