Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. HEBERT, 2:14-cr-00140-MCE. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20150821b35 Visitors: 8
Filed: Aug. 19, 2015
Latest Update: Aug. 19, 2015
Summary: AMENDED STIPULATION REGARDING EXCLUDABLE TIME PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT; ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr. , Chief District Judge . Defendant Richard Hebert, by and through Linda M. Parisi, his counsel of record, and plaintiff, by and through its counsel, Matthew G. Morris, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. By previous order, this matter was set for status on August 20, 2015. 2. By this stipulation, the defendant now moves to continue the status conference until October 8, 2015, at 9:0
More

AMENDED STIPULATION REGARDING EXCLUDABLE TIME PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT; ORDER

Defendant Richard Hebert, by and through Linda M. Parisi, his counsel of record, and plaintiff, by and through its counsel, Matthew G. Morris, hereby stipulate as follows:

1. By previous order, this matter was set for status on August 20, 2015.

2. By this stipulation, the defendant now moves to continue the status conference until October 8, 2015, at 9:00 a.m. and to exclude time between August 20, 2015 and October 8, 2015 and under Local Code T4. The United States does not oppose this request.

3. The parties agree and stipulate, and request that the Court find the following:

a. The United States has represented that the discovery associated with this case includes investigative reports and related documents.

b. Counsel for Mr. Hebert need additional time to consult, to review discovery, and to discuss potential resolutions, including setting the matter for trial.

c. Counsel for defendant Mr. Hebert believe that failure to grant the above-requested continuance would deny them the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.

d. The United States Attorney agrees to the continuance.

e. All counsel agrees to the continuance.

f. For the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C.§ 3161, et seq., within which trial must commence, the time period of August 20, 2015 and October 8, 2015, inclusive, is deemed excludable pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 3161(h)(7)(A), B(iv) [Local CodeT4] because it results from a continuance granted by the Court at defendant's request on the basis of the Court's finding that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

4. Nothing in this stipulation and order shall preclude a finding that other provisions of the Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time periods are excludable from the period within which a trial must commence.

ORDER

Based on the reasons set forth in the stipulation of the parties filed on August 19, 2015, and good cause appearing therefrom, the Court adopts the stipulation of the parties in its entirety. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the status conference currently set for August 20, 2015, be vacated and that a status conference be set for October 8, 2015, at 9:00 a.m. The Court finds that the ends of justice to be served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, for the reasons stated in the parties' August 19, 2015, stipulation, the time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act is excluded during the time period of August 20, 2015, through and including October 8, 2015, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) and Local Code 25.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer