Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Beaver, 2:15-MJ-0040-AC (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20150821b58 Visitors: 7
Filed: Aug. 05, 2015
Latest Update: Aug. 05, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING PRELIMINARY HEARING DATE DALE A. DROZD , Magistrate Judge . STIPULATION The United States, by and through its undersigned counsel, and the defendants, by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. By prior order, these matters were set for Preliminary Hearing on August 7, 2015. 2. By this Stipulation, the parties now move to continue the Preliminary Hearing until August 21, 2015, at 2:00 p.m. 3. By this Stipulation, the parties
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING PRELIMINARY HEARING DATE

STIPULATION

The United States, by and through its undersigned counsel, and the defendants, by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:

1. By prior order, these matters were set for Preliminary Hearing on August 7, 2015. 2. By this Stipulation, the parties now move to continue the Preliminary Hearing until August 21, 2015, at 2:00 p.m. 3. By this Stipulation, the parties also move to set a Status of Counsel Hearing for Sharod Gibbons on August 7, 2015, at 2:00 p.m. 4. Defendant Bryce Beaver made his initial appearance on March 4, 2015. Defendant Sharod Gibbons made his initial appearance on March 13, 2015. 5. Both defendants are presently out of custody and being supervised by a Pretrial Services Officer. 6. The United States has provided discovery to both defendants. This discovery consists of 30 CDs, including several hours of audio and video recordings. 7. The parties have discussed a potential pre-indictment resolution of this matter. The parties need further time to discuss this matter, discuss any potential consequences, and to allow counsel for the defendants reasonable time necessary for preparation and further investigation. 8. The defendants understand that pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(b), "any information or indictment charging an individual with the commission of an offense shall be filed within thirty days from the date on which such individual was arrested." Time may be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act if the Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting such a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A). The parties jointly move to exclude time within which any indictment or information shall be filed from the date of this order, through and including August 21, 2015, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv), because failure to do so would "deny counsel for the defendant . . . the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence." 9. Good cause exists under Rule 5.1(d) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

IT IS SO FOUND AND ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer