Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

MONCRIEF v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, 2:12-cv-00414-MCE-AC P. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20150902641 Visitors: 6
Filed: Sep. 01, 2015
Latest Update: Sep. 01, 2015
Summary: ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr. , District Judge . Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding through counsel, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 30, 2015, the magistrate judge filed Findings and Recommendations herein (ECF No. 71), which were served on all parties and which contained notice that any objections to the Findings and Re
More

ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding through counsel, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On July 30, 2015, the magistrate judge filed Findings and Recommendations herein (ECF No. 71), which were served on all parties and which contained notice that any objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed objections to the Findings and Recommendations.

The Court has reviewed the file and finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed July 30, 2015 (ECF No. 71) are ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. Defendants' motion to partially dismiss the third amended complaint (ECF No. 62) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows:

a. GRANTED as to Defendant CDCR, who is now DISMISSED from this action; b. GRANTED as to Count V against Defendants Grounds and Frias; and c. DENIED as to Count V against Defendant Gorham;

3. Plaintiff's request for leave to amend is DENIED. If plaintiff seeks to amend his complaint, he must file a motion to amend the complaint within twenty-one (21) days of the date that this order is electronically filed. The motion must be accompanied by a proposed amended complaint. See E.D. Cal. Local Rule 137(c).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer