ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge.

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. ECF No. 1. Pending before the court is respondent's motion to dismiss the petition as untimely and unexhausted. ECF No. 14. In his opposition to respondent's motion, petitioner asserts that he filed a petition for review with the California Supreme Court on May 1, 2013 and attaches a copy of the petition as "Exhibit A" to his opposition. ECF No. 19. However, the face sheet of the petition attached as "Exhibit A" does not contain a file or "docketed" stamp indicating that it was received by the California Supreme Court. See id. at 10. Petitioner further asserts that the California Supreme Court issued a ruling on his petition for review. However, he has not provided the court with a copy of this ruling.

Respondent represents that there is no record a petition for review was ever filed, let alone ruled on, in petitioner's case. The court's review of the California appellate courts' online records database, available at http://appellatecases.courtinfo.ca.gov, confirms that it contains no record of any California Supreme Court filing by petitioner.1

Accordingly, petitioner is directed to file any documentation in his possession that demonstrates his petition for review, Exhibit A to ECF No. 19, was actually presented to and/or ruled on by the California Supreme Court.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner file within seven (7) days from the date of this order:

(3) If petitioner has no responsive documents, he shall file a statement so informing the court.