Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

JACKSON v. PONCE, 2:15-cv-1700 GGH P. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20150911696 Visitors: 8
Filed: Sep. 10, 2015
Latest Update: Sep. 10, 2015
Summary: ORDER GREGORY G. HOLLOWS , Magistrate Judge . Petitioner has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241, and paid the requisite filing fee. Since petitioner may be entitled to the requested relief if the claimed violation of constitutional rights is proved, respondent will be directed to file an answer or a motion to dismiss. In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Respondent is directed to file an answer or a motion to dismiss within
More

ORDER

Petitioner has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, and paid the requisite filing fee. Since petitioner may be entitled to the requested relief if the claimed violation of constitutional rights is proved, respondent will be directed to file an answer or a motion to dismiss.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Respondent is directed to file an answer or a motion to dismiss within sixty (60) days from the date of this order. If an answer is filed, respondent shall include with the answer any and all transcripts or other documents relevant to the determination of the issues presented in the application.

2. Petitioner's traverse, if any, is due on or before thirty (30) days from the date respondent's answer is filed; an opposition to a motion to dismiss is due within thirty days of service of the motion to dismiss.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer