GREEN v. CITY OF VALLEJO, 2:15-cv-1941-GEB-KJN PS. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20150917f01
Visitors: 7
Filed: Sep. 15, 2015
Latest Update: Sep. 15, 2015
Summary: ORDER KENDALL J. NEWMAN , Magistrate Judge . This action was transferred to this district from the Northern District of California on September 11, 2015. (ECF No. 15.) 1 Defendants previously filed a motion to dismiss, which remains pending. (ECF No. 11.) Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff shall file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion to dismiss no later than October 15, 2015. 2. Defendants shall file any reply brief no later than October 29, 20
Summary: ORDER KENDALL J. NEWMAN , Magistrate Judge . This action was transferred to this district from the Northern District of California on September 11, 2015. (ECF No. 15.) 1 Defendants previously filed a motion to dismiss, which remains pending. (ECF No. 11.) Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff shall file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion to dismiss no later than October 15, 2015. 2. Defendants shall file any reply brief no later than October 29, 201..
More
ORDER
KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.
This action was transferred to this district from the Northern District of California on September 11, 2015. (ECF No. 15.)1 Defendants previously filed a motion to dismiss, which remains pending. (ECF No. 11.) Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff shall file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion to dismiss no later than October 15, 2015.
2. Defendants shall file any reply brief no later than October 29, 2015.
3. A hearing on the motion to dismiss is set for Thursday November 12, 2015, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom No. 25 before the undersigned.
4. Plaintiff is cautioned that failure to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion to dismiss by the required deadline may result in the imposition of sanctions, including potential dismissal of the action with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. This action proceeds before the undersigned pursuant to E.D. Cal. L.R. 302(c)(21).
Source: Leagle
