Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

FOLKENS v. WYLAND, 2:14-cv-02197-GEB-CKD. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20151030835 Visitors: 13
Filed: Oct. 29, 2015
Latest Update: Oct. 29, 2015
Summary: ORDER GARLAND E. BURRELL, Jr. , District Judge . On October 7, 2015, Plaintiff submitted for in camera consideration multiple documents concerning a "Motion to File Document Under Seal, to Unseal Document[,] and to Determine Whether Defendants Will Seek a Protective Order." However, no Notice of Request to Seal was filed on the public docket as generally required by Local Rule 141, nor did Plaintiff show why it should be excused from complying with that requirement. See E.D. Cal. R. 141(b
More

ORDER

On October 7, 2015, Plaintiff submitted for in camera consideration multiple documents concerning a "Motion to File Document Under Seal, to Unseal Document[,] and to Determine Whether Defendants Will Seek a Protective Order." However, no Notice of Request to Seal was filed on the public docket as generally required by Local Rule 141, nor did Plaintiff show why it should be excused from complying with that requirement. See E.D. Cal. R. 141(b) ("Except in pre-indictment criminal investigations in which sealing is sought, the `Notice of Request to Seal Documents' shall be filed. . . .").

Therefore, Plaintiff's sealing motion is not considered, and the documents emailed to chambers for in camera consideration are treated as having been returned to Plaintiff. Cf. E.D. Cal. R. 141(e)(1) ("If a [sealing r]equest is denied in full or in part, the Clerk will return to the submitting party the documents for which sealing has been denied.").

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer