STROMAN v. DAVIS, 2:14-524 WBS CKD. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20151103485
Visitors: 24
Filed: Nov. 02, 2015
Latest Update: Nov. 02, 2015
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM B. SHUBB , District Judge . On October 21, 2015, Darryl Geyer, an incarcerated witness who was subpoenaed to testify at trial by the defendant, filed a motion to testify via video conference. (Docket No. 75.) Mr. Geyer states that being transported to Sacramento for trial would result in an undue personal hardship and inhibit his ability to become parole suitable. The parties shall file a response to the motion no later than ten court days from the file-stamped date of this Or
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM B. SHUBB , District Judge . On October 21, 2015, Darryl Geyer, an incarcerated witness who was subpoenaed to testify at trial by the defendant, filed a motion to testify via video conference. (Docket No. 75.) Mr. Geyer states that being transported to Sacramento for trial would result in an undue personal hardship and inhibit his ability to become parole suitable. The parties shall file a response to the motion no later than ten court days from the file-stamped date of this Ord..
More
ORDER
WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge.
On October 21, 2015, Darryl Geyer, an incarcerated witness who was subpoenaed to testify at trial by the defendant, filed a motion to testify via video conference. (Docket No. 75.) Mr. Geyer states that being transported to Sacramento for trial would result in an undue personal hardship and inhibit his ability to become parole suitable. The parties shall file a response to the motion no later than ten court days from the file-stamped date of this Order. The court will then take the matter under submission without oral argument pursuant to Eastern District Local Rule 78-230(h).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
