Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. CLEMANS, CR 2:15-MJ-0151 AC. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20151119c39 Visitors: 2
Filed: Nov. 18, 2015
Latest Update: Nov. 18, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING PURSUANT TO RULE 5.1(d) AND TO EXCLUDE TIME CAROLYN K. DELANEY , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between the Government, through Special Assistant United States Attorney Josh Sigal, and Defendant Michael Carey Clemans, through his attorney of record Daniel Olmos, that the time for preliminary hearing be extended from November 19, 2015, at 2:00 p.m., to December 3, 2015, at 2:00 p.m., pursuant to Federal Rule
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING PURSUANT TO RULE 5.1(d) AND TO EXCLUDE TIME

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between the Government, through Special Assistant United States Attorney Josh Sigal, and Defendant Michael Carey Clemans, through his attorney of record Daniel Olmos, that the time for preliminary hearing be extended from November 19, 2015, at 2:00 p.m., to December 3, 2015, at 2:00 p.m., pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5.1(d).

The Complaint in this matter was filed on July 22, 2015, and Defendant Clemans first appeared before the Court on July 24, 2015. The preliminary hearing is currently set for November 19, 2105. The parties stipulate and agree that a continuance of the preliminary hearing date is necessary because undersigned defense counsel needs additional time to review discovery provided by the Government and to investigate the defense case. In addition, defense counsel has had an unexpected conflict arise in a federal criminal case out of the state, so a continuance of the November 19 date is also necessary to ensure continuity of counsel. The parties further agree that the interests of justice served by excluding the period of time between November 19 and December 3, 2015, outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in the speedy return of an indictment and a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(A).

The parties agree that good cause exists for the extension of time, and that the extension of time would not adversely affect the public interest in the prompt disposition of criminal cases. Therefore, the parties request that the time between November 19 and December 3, 2015, be excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv), Local Code T-4.

IT IS SO STIPULATED:

ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING PURSUANT TO RULE 5.1(d) AND TO EXCLUDE TIME

GOOD CAUSE HAVING BEEN SHOWN, and pursuant to stipulation by the parties, it is hereby ordered that the preliminary hearing now scheduled for November 19, 2015, at 2:00 p.m. is continued to December 3, 2015, at 2:00 p.m. pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5.1(d). The parties shall appear at that date and time before the Magistrate Judge on duty. The Court finds that interests of justice served by excluding this period of time in which an indictment must be returned outweigh the best interests of the public and defendant in a speedy return of an indictment and a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A). The Court further finds that the extension of time would not adversely affect the public interest in the prompt disposition of criminal cases.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer