Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. CHAND, 2:15-CV-00518-GEB-DAD. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20151202f97 Visitors: 3
Filed: Dec. 01, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 01, 2015
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE GARLAND E. BURRELL, Jr. , Senior District Judge . Upon the motion of the United States of America and the Declaration of Aaron Bailey, it is hereby ORDERED that the Defendant, Sarad Chand, shall appear before United States District Judge Garland E. Burrell, in Courtroom 10 in the United States District Courthouse in Sacramento, California on the 12th day of January, 2016, at 8:30 a.m., to show cause why he should not be held in contempt of this Court's May 19, 2015 Orde
More

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Upon the motion of the United States of America and the Declaration of Aaron Bailey, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Defendant, Sarad Chand, shall appear before United States District Judge Garland E. Burrell, in Courtroom 10 in the United States District Courthouse in Sacramento, California on the 12th day of January, 2016, at 8:30 a.m., to show cause why he should not be held in contempt of this Court's May 19, 2015 Order.

It is further ORDERED that:

1. A copy of this Order, together with the petition, memorandum of points and authorities, the Declaration of Aaron Bailey and its exhibits, and the Declaration of Aaron Bailey, shall be served upon the respondent in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.

2. If defendant Sarad Chand has any defense to present or opposition to the United States' motion, such defense or opposition shall be made in writing and filed with the Clerk and copies served on counsel for the United States in Washington D.C., at least fourteen (14) days prior to the date set for the show cause hearing. The United States may file a reply memorandum to any opposition at least five (5) court days prior to the date set for the show cause hearing.

3. At the show cause hearing, the Court will consider all issues raised by respondent Sarad Chand. Only those issues brought into controversy by the responsive pleadings and supported by affidavit will be considered. Any uncontested allegation in the United States' motion and supporting documents will be considered admitted.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer