ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY v. CENTEX HOMES, 2:14-cv-2640 WBS CKD. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20151204820
Visitors: 3
Filed: Dec. 03, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 03, 2015
Summary: ORDER CAROLYN K. DELANEY , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to the order filed November 19, 2015, plaintiff submitted documents for in camera review along with an updated privilege log. Defendant submitted a letter brief identifying the documents for which it seeks in camera review. Upon review of the documents, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff shall produce, for copying and inspection the documents identified as follows: TRV-NI000007 TRV-NI000111-112 2.
Summary: ORDER CAROLYN K. DELANEY , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to the order filed November 19, 2015, plaintiff submitted documents for in camera review along with an updated privilege log. Defendant submitted a letter brief identifying the documents for which it seeks in camera review. Upon review of the documents, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff shall produce, for copying and inspection the documents identified as follows: TRV-NI000007 TRV-NI000111-112 2. ..
More
ORDER
CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge.
Pursuant to the order filed November 19, 2015, plaintiff submitted documents for in camera review along with an updated privilege log. Defendant submitted a letter brief identifying the documents for which it seeks in camera review. Upon review of the documents, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff shall produce, for copying and inspection the documents identified as follows:
TRV-NI000007
TRV-NI000111-112
2. With respect to the documents itemized at line 21 of the revised privilege log, plaintiff shall produce, for copying and inspection, the proposed redacted version as identified in the submitted documents. However, the following proposed redactions are not allowed:
TRV-NI000128, third proposed redaction at 6/18/15 at 1:56 p.m.
TRV-NI000129, third proposed redaction at 4/21/15 at 6:12 p.m.
TRV-NI000133, second proposed redaction at 2/20/15 at 12:37p.m.
TRV-NI000134, second proposed redaction at 2/12/15 at 5:42 p.m.
3. The court finds an award of expenses is not warranted considering all of the circumstances reflected in the record before it on this motion. Fed. R. Civ. P. 37 (a)(5)(A).
Source: Leagle
