Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. SINGH, 2:15-CR-00161-JAM. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20151214634 Visitors: 6
Filed: Dec. 10, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 10, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE OF STATUS CONFERENCE JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . Plaintiff, United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendant, by and through his counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. By previous order, this matter was set for a Status Conference on December 15, 2015, at 9:15 a.m. 2. By this stipulation, defendant now moves to continue the Status Conference until February 16, 2016, at 9:15 a.m. and to exclude time betw
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE OF STATUS CONFERENCE

Plaintiff, United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendant, by and through his counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:

1. By previous order, this matter was set for a Status Conference on December 15, 2015, at 9:15 a.m.

2. By this stipulation, defendant now moves to continue the Status Conference until February 16, 2016, at 9:15 a.m. and to exclude time between December 15, 2015, and February 16, 2016, under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), B(iv). Plaintiff does not oppose this request.

3. The parties agree and stipulate, and request that the Court find the following:

a. Additional time is needed for investigations and review of an enormous amount of discovery. b. The government does not object to the continuance. c. Based on the above-stated findings, the ends of justice served by continuing the case as requested outweigh the interest of the public and the defendant in a trial within the original date prescribed by the Speedy Trial Act. d. For the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, et seq., within which trial must commence, the time period of December 15, 2015, to February 16, 2016, inclusive, is deemed excludable pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), B(iv) because it results from a continuance granted by the Court at defendant's request on the basis of the Court's finding that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

4. Nothing in this stipulation and order shall preclude a finding that other provisions of the Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time periods are excludable from the period within which a trial must commence.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DATED: December 10, 2015 /s/Todd A. Pickles TODD A. PICKLES Assistant United States Attorney.

ORDER

For the reasons set forth above, the continuance requested by the parties is granted for good cause and time is excluded under the Speedy Trial Act from December 15, 2015, to, and including, February 16, 2016, based upon the Court's finding that the ends of justice outweigh the public's and defendant's interest in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A).

IT IS ORDERED that the Status Conference currently scheduled for December 15, 2015, at 9:15 a.m. is continued to February 16, 2016, at 9: 15 a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer