Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. WASICKI, 2:14-CR-0054-MCE. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20151216a44 Visitors: 19
Filed: Dec. 15, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 15, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND RESTITUTION ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr. , Chief District Judge . The United States of America, by and through its attorney of record, and defendant Denise Erika Wasicki ("Defendant"), by and through her counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. On or about May 14, 2015, Defendant appeared before the Court and entered a guilty plea to Count Fifteen and Count Twenty-Two of the Indictment, which charged Defendant with Mail Fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1341, fe
More

STIPULATION AND RESTITUTION ORDER

The United States of America, by and through its attorney of record, and defendant Denise Erika Wasicki ("Defendant"), by and through her counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:

1. On or about May 14, 2015, Defendant appeared before the Court and entered a guilty plea to Count Fifteen and Count Twenty-Two of the Indictment, which charged Defendant with Mail Fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341, felonies.

2. On or about October 8, 2015, the Court sentenced Defendant to concurrent terms of thirty-three months' imprisonment on each Count, to be followed by concurrent terms of thirty-six months of Supervised Release. The Court also imposed a $200 special assessment but waived a fine.

3. The Court ordered Defendant to self-surrender not later than 2:00 p.m., on January 5, 2016, to the institution designated by the Bureau of Prisons or, if no such designation has been made by that date, to the custody of the United States Marshal Service located in the Eastern District of California.

4. The Court did not order restitution at the time of sentencing and left the matter of restitution to be determined at a hearing scheduled for December 3, 2014.

5. On or about December 3, 2015, the Court granted the parties' joint request to continue the restitution hearing to December 17, 2015.

6. By this stipulation, the parties jointly request that the Court issue an amended judgment and commitment that includes an order that Defendant pay restitution in the amounts set forth herein.

7. The parties agree that amount of loss suffered by each victim as set forth in this Stipulation is supported by a preponderance of the evidence.

8. The parties further agree that, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3664(f), the Court may order restitution to each victim in the full amount of each victim's losses without consideration of Defendant's economic circumstances. However, the parties agree that Defendant possesses some future earning capacity upon which she may rely, to the extent possible, to support payment of restitution as set forth in this Stipulation.

9. Defendant agrees to pay restitution as set forth herein and waives, to the full extent of the law, any appeal, collateral attack, or other challenge to the Court's restitution order. Defendant further agrees not to attempt to discharge in bankruptcy proceedings any remaining payment obligation under the restitution order imposed by the Court pursuant to this Stipulation.

10. Specifically, Defendant agrees to pay restitution as follows:

Name of Payee Restitution Ordered Priority or Percentage Aerotek $390,624.21 Proportional up to 100% 7301 Parkway Drive Hanover, MD 21076 c/o Edward T. Choilo hook Hardy & Bacon LLP $78,124.84 Proportional up to 100% P.O. Box 843223 Kansas City, MO 64184-3223 c/o The Shook, Hardy & Bacon Client Trust Account (Reference Aerotek Restitution Payment) TOTAL: $468,749.05

11. The parties further agree that payment of restitution during Defendant's imprisonment should be made at the rate of not less than $25 per quarter, through the Bureau of Prisons Inmate Financial Responsibility Program.

12. The parties further acknowledge and agree that Defendant is statutorily required to pay interest on restitution greater than $2,500, unless the restitution is paid in full before the fifteenth day after the date of the judgment, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3612(f), and that payments may be subject to penalties for delinquency and default, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3612(g). The parties acknowledge and agree that the Court may waive the requirement for interest if the Court finds that Defendant does not have the ability to pay interest. See 18 U.S.C. § 3612(f)(3)(A). The parties acknowledge and agree that Defendant does not have the ability to pay interest on the proposed total restitution in this matter and jointly recommend that the Court so find and waive the requirement for interest payments.

13. The parties agree that by the Court's execution of this Stipulation and proposed order, the restitution hearing scheduled for December 17, 2015 is rendered moot and should be vacated.

14. The parties further agree that by execution of this Stipulation and proposed order, this matter is closed.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation between the parties and for good cause shown, the Court finds that:

1. The amount of loss suffered by each victim as set forth in the Stipulation is supported by a preponderance of the evidence.

2. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3664(f), the Court may order restitution to each victim in the full amount of each victim's losses without consideration of Defendant's economic circumstances. In any event, as stipulated by the parties, Defendant possesses some future earning capacity upon which she may rely, to the extent possible, to support payment of restitution as set forth in the Stipulation.

3. Defendant agrees to pay restitution as set forth in the Stipulation and waives, to the full extent of the law, any appeal, collateral attack, or other challenge to the Court's restitution order. Defendant further agrees not to attempt to discharge in bankruptcy proceedings any payment obligations under the restitution order imposed by the Court pursuant to the Stipulation.

4. Defendant does not have the ability to pay interest on the total restitution set forth in the Stipulation and, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3612(f)(3)(A), the Court may waive the requirement for interest payments.

Accordingly, pursuant to the Stipulation between the parties and for good cause shown, it is hereby

ORDERED, that Defendant shall pay restitution to the victims and in the amounts that follow:

Name of Payee Restitution Ordered Priority or Percentage Aerotek $390,624.21 Proportional up to 100% 7301 Parkway Drive Hanover, MD 21076 c/o Edward T. Choilo Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP $78,124.84 Proportional up to 100% P.O. Box 843223 Kansas City, MO 64184-3223 c/o The Shook, Hardy & Bacon Client Trust Account (Reference Aerotek Restitution Payment) TOTAL: $468,749.05

And it is further

ORDERED, that during her imprisonment, Defendant shall make restitution payments at a rate of not less than $25 per quarter, through the Bureau of Prisons Inmate Financial Responsibility Program, and thereafter at the rate of not less than $25 per month. And it is further

ORDERED, that, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3612(f)(3)(A), the requirement that Defendant pay interest on the total restitution amount is waived. And it is further

ORDERED, that the restitution hearing scheduled for December 17, 2015 is VACATED.

The Court shall issue an Amended Judgment and Commitment ordering Defendant to pay restitution consistent with this Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer