Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

CHATMAN v. FELKER, 2:06-cv-02912 RCJ. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20151218960 Visitors: 13
Filed: Nov. 04, 2015
Latest Update: Nov. 04, 2015
Summary: STIPULATED DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE [FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)] AS TO DEFENDANTS COX, HARVEY AND JAMES ROBERT C. JONES , District Judge . It is hereby stipulated, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, by and between the Plaintiff CHARLES CHATMAN, in pro se and Defendants COX, HARVEY and JAMES, by and through their attorney, Jonathan B. Paul, Esq., that these individual defendants and Plaintiff's claims against them for deliberate indifference to his serious me
More

STIPULATED DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE [FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)] AS TO DEFENDANTS COX, HARVEY AND JAMES

It is hereby stipulated, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, by and between the Plaintiff CHARLES CHATMAN, in pro se and Defendants COX, HARVEY and JAMES, by and through their attorney, Jonathan B. Paul, Esq., that these individual defendants and Plaintiff's claims against them for deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs are dismissed with prejudice forthwith. Each side is to bear their own attorney's fees and costs.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF ENTIRE CASE

PLAINTIFF CHARLES CHATMAN and DEFENDANTS RATH, AMERO, KOENIG, PFADT, KEATING, LAGUNA, J. STILES, GUIMOND, ROSS, HOUGLAND, DILLARD, PARK, GORDON, PATTON, BARCUS and S. STILES hereby give notice to the Court that the parties have reached a settlement upon all of Plaintiff's remaining claims which resolves the entire case. It is anticipated the parties will require no more than 45 days to file dispositional documents. It is hereby requested that all future applicable dates be vacated in light of the settlement and that the Court recall the order and writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum issued for Plaintiff Charles Chatman on October 14, 2015.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

STIPULATED DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE [FRCP 41(a)(1)(a)(ii)]

It is hereby stipulated, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, by and between the Plaintiff CHARLES CHATMAN, in pro se and Defendants RATH, AMERO, KOENIG, PFADT, KEATING, LAGUNA, J. STILES, GUIMOND, ROSS, HOUGLAND, DILLARD, PARK, GORDON, PATTON, BARCUS and S. STILES, by and through their attorney, Jonathan B. Paul, Esq., that the entire action is dismissed with prejudice forthwith. Each side is to bear their own attorney's fees.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer