Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. KOVALEV, 2:13-CR-00103 MCE. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20160112839 Visitors: 5
Filed: Jan. 11, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 11, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE/TRIAL SETTING; ORDER 18 U.S.C. 3161 MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr. , Chief District Judge . STIPULATION Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendants Aleksandr Kovalev, and Arthur Menefee, by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. By previous order this matter was set for a status hearing on December 10, 2015. 2. By this stipulation, defendants now move to continue the status c
More

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE/TRIAL SETTING; ORDER

18 U.S.C. § 3161

STIPULATION

Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendants Aleksandr Kovalev, and Arthur Menefee, by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:

1. By previous order this matter was set for a status hearing on December 10, 2015.

2. By this stipulation, defendants now move to continue the status conference until December 17, 2015. Pursuant to the Court's prior order, time was previously excluded until

3. The parties agree and stipulate, and request that the Court find the following:

a) On May 1, 2013, the parties except Florence Francisco appeared before the Court for a status hearing at which time the Court, the Honorable Kimberly J. Mueller, presiding, deemed the case complex under Local Code T2 and the corresponding section of the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, et seq.

b) Counsel for the Mr. Kovalev was unavailable for December 10, 2015 due to another matter pending in the Northern District of California, and has requested the matter be continued to December 17, 2015.

c) The United States does not object to the continuance.

4. Nothing in this stipulation and order shall preclude a finding that other provisions of the Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time periods are excludable from the period within which a trial must commence.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: December 15, 2015 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney /s/ Todd A. Pickles TODD A. PICKLES, ESQ. Assistant United States Attorney

ORDER

The status conference previously set for December 10, 2015, is hereby CONTINUED to December 17, 2015, at 9:00 a.m., pursuant to the parties' stipulation. For the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, et seq., within which trial must commence, the time period of October 8, 2015 through December 17, 2015, inclusive, is deemed excludable pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 3161(h)(7)(A), B(iv) [Local Code T4] because it results from a continuance granted by the Court at defendants' request on the basis of the Court's finding that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer