Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. BHAMANI, 2:10-CR-327 TLN. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20160122653 Visitors: 15
Filed: Jan. 21, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 21, 2016
Summary: THIRD AMENDED STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING RESTITUTION STIPULATION TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . The United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendants Akbar Bhamani, Zain Bhamani, Aly Bhamani, Feroza Bhamani, and Ken Sarna, by and through their respective counsel of record, together respectfully request that the Court vacate the Second Amended Restitution Order (ECF No. 342) and the currently scheduled January 21, 2016 restitution status conference, and o
More

THIRD AMENDED STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING RESTITUTION STIPULATION

The United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendants Akbar Bhamani, Zain Bhamani, Aly Bhamani, Feroza Bhamani, and Ken Sarna, by and through their respective counsel of record, together respectfully request that the Court vacate the Second Amended Restitution Order (ECF No. 342) and the currently scheduled January 21, 2016 restitution status conference, and order the defendants to pay restitution in the amount of $8,764,131.24 for the following reasons:

On October 8, 2015, the Court entered a Second Amended Order Regarding Restitution, holding defendants Akbar Bhamani, Zain Bhamani, Aly Bhamani, Feroza Bhamani, and Ken Sarna jointly and severally liable for restitution in the amount of $8,651,031.36. Following entry of this order, one of the victims of defendants' unlawful scheme came forward with a claimed loss that was not included in the Second Amended Restitution Order.

On December 9, 2015, the government filed a Request for Status Conference Regarding Restitution as to Akbar Bhamani, Zain Bhamani, Aly Bhamani, Feroza Bhamani, and Ken Sarna. ECF No. 362. Since filing that request, the parties have met and conferred regarding the proper restitution amount in this case. Pursuant to those discussions and the respective parties' plea agreements, which memorialize defendants' obligation to pay restitution under 18 U.S.C. § 3663(a)(3), the parties hereby stipulate and agree that defendants Akbar Bhamani, Zain Bhamani, Aly Bhamani, Feroza Bhamani, and Ken Sarna are jointly and severally liable for restitution in the amount of $8,764,131.24.

Payment shall be made by cashier's check payable to the Clerk of the Court for the Eastern District of California. The defendants shall not seek to discharge any restitution obligation or any part of such obligation in any bankruptcy proceeding. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3664(k), the defendants also understand that they must notify the Court and the Attorney General of any material change in their economic circumstances that might affect the defendants' ability to pay restitution.

The parties will separately provide to the Clerk's office and the Probation Office an itemized list of the amounts due to individual victims along with the victims' addresses.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

The Court has reviewed the Stipulation of the parties for an order holding Akbar Bhamani, Zain Bhamani, Aly Bhamani, Feroza Bhamani, and Ken Sarna jointly and severally liable for restitution in the amount of $8,764,131.24. Based on that stipulation and the defendants' obligation to pay restitution pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3663(a)(3), as memorialized in their plea agreements, the Court finds good cause to enter an order holding Akbar Bhamani, Zain Bhamani, Aly Bhamani, Feroza Bhamani, and Ken Sarna jointly and severally liable for restitution in the amount of $8,764,131.24.

Payment shall be made by cashier's check payable to the Clerk of the Court for the Eastern District of California. The defendants shall not seek to discharge any restitution obligation or any part of such obligation in any bankruptcy proceeding. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3664(k), the defendants must notify the Court and the Attorney General of any material change in their economic circumstances that might affect the defendants' ability to pay restitution.

The parties are further ordered to provide the Clerk's office and the Probation Office within 72 hours of this Order an itemized list of the victims, victims' addresses, and amounts owing to each victim. The hearing set for Thursday, January 21, 2016, at 9:30 a.m. in the above-captioned matter is hereby vacated.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer