BARRON v. MARTEL, 2:10-CV-01567-WBS-EFB (TEMP). (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20160126d15
Visitors: 4
Filed: Jan. 22, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 22, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION REGARDING ADMISSIBILITY OF MEDICAL RECORDS RECORDS WILLIAM B. SHUBB , District Judge . STIPULATION REGARDING ADMISSIBILITY OF MEDICAL RECORDS WHEREAS, Plaintiff Ronnie E. Barron ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Kelly Martinez and K. Todd ("Defendants") have collected and exchanged the following bates-stamped medical records maintained by: (1) California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (MR 00001-MR 02083) (2) Doctors Hospital of Manteca ([Barron] 001-[Barron] 040) (
Summary: STIPULATION REGARDING ADMISSIBILITY OF MEDICAL RECORDS RECORDS WILLIAM B. SHUBB , District Judge . STIPULATION REGARDING ADMISSIBILITY OF MEDICAL RECORDS WHEREAS, Plaintiff Ronnie E. Barron ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Kelly Martinez and K. Todd ("Defendants") have collected and exchanged the following bates-stamped medical records maintained by: (1) California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (MR 00001-MR 02083) (2) Doctors Hospital of Manteca ([Barron] 001-[Barron] 040) (3..
More
STIPULATION REGARDING ADMISSIBILITY OF MEDICAL RECORDS RECORDS
WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge.
STIPULATION REGARDING ADMISSIBILITY OF MEDICAL RECORDS
WHEREAS, Plaintiff Ronnie E. Barron ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Kelly Martinez and K. Todd ("Defendants") have collected and exchanged the following bates-stamped medical records maintained by:
(1) California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (MR 00001-MR 02083)
(2) Doctors Hospital of Manteca ([Barron] 001-[Barron] 040)
(3) UC Davis Medical Center (BAR00001-BAR01019).
WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendants stipulate to the authenticity of these records subject to the terms and conditions set forth below:
NOW THEREFORE, the undersigned parties hereto stipulate and agree as follows:
(1) That Plaintiff and Defendants stipulate as to the authenticity of copies of these records. The parties hereto waive any objection(s) to the admissibility of these records on the ground that they are not authentic;
(2) That such records, except for any statements written by Plaintiff, constitute records of a regularly conducted activity within the meaning of Federal Rule of Evidence 803(6). The parties hereto waive any objection(s) to the admissibility of such documents on the ground that they do not meet the requirements of Federal rule of Evidence 803(6).
(3) That by executing this Stipulation, neither Plaintiff nor Defendants waive any other objections they may have to the admissibility of these documents, or statements contained therein.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
