CHANG v. COLVIN, 1:15-cv-0310-EPG. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20160129a30
Visitors: 10
Filed: Jan. 27, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 27, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, through their undersigned attorneys, to extend Defendant's time to file her response to Plaintiff's opening brief by 35 days to March 2, 2016, and that all other scheduling dates set forth in the Court's Case Management Order shall be extended accordingly. This is Defendant's second request for an extension of time in this matter. 1 There is good cause for t
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, through their undersigned attorneys, to extend Defendant's time to file her response to Plaintiff's opening brief by 35 days to March 2, 2016, and that all other scheduling dates set forth in the Court's Case Management Order shall be extended accordingly. This is Defendant's second request for an extension of time in this matter. 1 There is good cause for th..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE
ERICA P. GROSJEAN, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, through their undersigned attorneys, to extend Defendant's time to file her response to Plaintiff's opening brief by 35 days to March 2, 2016, and that all other scheduling dates set forth in the Court's Case Management Order shall be extended accordingly. This is Defendant's second request for an extension of time in this matter.1
There is good cause for this extension because counsel for Defendant requires additional time to properly consider and research the issues presented in Plaintiff's opening brief. Furthermore, additional time is required because counsel for Defendant is responsible for drafting various pleadings before the district courts within the Ninth Circuit, negotiating or litigating attorney fee matters pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, and conducting discovery in a personnel-related litigation matter pending before the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
Counsel for Defendant apologizes to the Court for any inconvenience caused by this delay.
ORDER
Pursuant to the parties' stipulation (Doc. 19), the Commissioner's response to Plaintiff's opening brief shall be filed no later than March 2, 2016. Any reply may be filed within fifteen days of the filing of the opposition.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. The Commissioner first sought an extension in this case because the Social Security Administration's Office of Disability Adjudication and Review was unable to prepare a complete certified administrative record.
Source: Leagle
