U.S. v. MOSS, 2:03-cr-0550-WBS-EFB P (TEMP). (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20160129a39
Visitors: 6
Filed: Jan. 28, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 28, 2016
Summary: ORDER EDMUND F. BRENNAN , Magistrate Judge . Movant Will Moss, Jr. is a federal prisoner proceeding through counsel with a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255. A status conference was held in the courtroom of the undersigned on January 27, 2016, at 10:00 a.m. Attorney Barry Morris appeared for movant. Assistant United States Attorney Justin Lee appeared for respondent. After discussions with counsel and good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that:
Summary: ORDER EDMUND F. BRENNAN , Magistrate Judge . Movant Will Moss, Jr. is a federal prisoner proceeding through counsel with a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255. A status conference was held in the courtroom of the undersigned on January 27, 2016, at 10:00 a.m. Attorney Barry Morris appeared for movant. Assistant United States Attorney Justin Lee appeared for respondent. After discussions with counsel and good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that: ..
More
ORDER
EDMUND F. BRENNAN, Magistrate Judge.
Movant Will Moss, Jr. is a federal prisoner proceeding through counsel with a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. A status conference was held in the courtroom of the undersigned on January 27, 2016, at 10:00 a.m. Attorney Barry Morris appeared for movant. Assistant United States Attorney Justin Lee appeared for respondent. After discussions with counsel and good cause appearing,
IT IS ORDERED that:
1. An evidentiary hearing is set for April 19, 2016, at 9:30 a.m. on movant's claim that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance during the plea bargain process.
2. Any trial briefs the parties wish to submit shall be filed by April 12, 2016.
3. Within thirty days from the date of this order, counsel for respondent shall file an application for a protective order regarding waiver of the attorney client privilege. That application may be in the form of a stipulation between the parties.
Source: Leagle
