LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL, District Judge.
On February 13, 2012, Petitioner filed a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On March 24, 2015, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations in which she recommended that the Court deny the petition for writ of habeas corpus and decline to issue a certificate of appealability. Petitioner filed objections on April 17, 2015. On May 26, 2015, the District Court adopted the findings and recommendations, ordered entry of judgment for Respondent, and declined to issue a certificate of appealability. Thereafter, Petitioner filed an appeal in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. On June 18, 2015, he moved the District Court for a certificate of appealability.
A petitioner seeking a writ of habeas corpus has no absolute entitlement to appeal a district court's denial of his petition, but may only appeal in certain circumstances. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 335-36 (2003). In a proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, an applicant may not appeal a District Court judgment unless the District Judge or a Circuit Judge issues a certificate of appealability under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c). F.R.App.P. 22(b). Section 2253(c) provides:
If a court denies a habeas petition, the court may only issue a certificate of appealability "if jurists of reason could disagree with the district court's resolution of his constitutional claims or that jurists could conclude the issues presented are adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further." Miller-El, 537 U.S. at 327; Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). Although the petitioner is not required to prove the merits of his case, he must demonstrate "something more than the absence of frivolity or the existence of mere good faith on his. . . part." Miller-El, 537 U.S. at 338.
In the present case, the Court finds that reasonable jurists would not find the Court's determination that Petitioner is not entitled to federal habeas corpus relief debatable, wrong, or deserving of encouragement to proceed further. Petitioner has not made the required substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Accordingly, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability.
The Court hereby DECLINES to issue a certificate of appealability.