TIMOFEEVA v. COLVIN, 2:14-cv-2560 AC. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20160204904
Visitors: 14
Filed: Feb. 03, 2016
Latest Update: Feb. 03, 2016
Summary: ORDER ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . On November 5, 2014, this Court ordered that within ninety (90) days, "all parties shall complete and return the enclosed Consent to Assignment or Request for Reassignment." ECF No. 6-1. That ninety day period has since passed and plaintiff has not responded in any way to the court's order. Accordingly, IS HEREBY ORDERED that within seven (7) days of this order, counsel for plaintiff shall Show Cause why sanctions should not be imposed for his fail
Summary: ORDER ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . On November 5, 2014, this Court ordered that within ninety (90) days, "all parties shall complete and return the enclosed Consent to Assignment or Request for Reassignment." ECF No. 6-1. That ninety day period has since passed and plaintiff has not responded in any way to the court's order. Accordingly, IS HEREBY ORDERED that within seven (7) days of this order, counsel for plaintiff shall Show Cause why sanctions should not be imposed for his failu..
More
ORDER
ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge.
On November 5, 2014, this Court ordered that within ninety (90) days, "all parties shall complete and return the enclosed Consent to Assignment or Request for Reassignment." ECF No. 6-1. That ninety day period has since passed and plaintiff has not responded in any way to the court's order.
Accordingly, IS HEREBY ORDERED that within seven (7) days of this order, counsel for plaintiff shall Show Cause why sanctions should not be imposed for his failure to comply with the court's November 5, 2014 Order Re Consent.
Source: Leagle
