Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. Cisneros-Vasquez, 1:14-CR-00173 LJO-SKO. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20160309e20 Visitors: 5
Filed: Mar. 08, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 08, 2016
Summary: UNITED STATES' MOTION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR THREE-WEEK EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL , District Judge . The United States of America, by and through its undersigned attorneys, hereby requests a three-week extension of time to respond to Defendant/Movant Cisneros-Vasquez's 2255 petition, to April 1, 2016. This motion is based on the attached declaration of Assistant U.S. Attorney Michael G. Tierney. A Proposed Order appears below. DECLARATION I, MICHAEL G. TIERNEY, d
More

UNITED STATES' MOTION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR THREE-WEEK EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND

The United States of America, by and through its undersigned attorneys, hereby requests a three-week extension of time to respond to Defendant/Movant Cisneros-Vasquez's § 2255 petition, to April 1, 2016. This motion is based on the attached declaration of Assistant U.S. Attorney Michael G. Tierney. A Proposed Order appears below.

DECLARATION

I, MICHAEL G. TIERNEY, declare as follows:

1. I am an Assistant U.S. Attorney (AUSA) for the Eastern District of California. I am familiar with the facts described below.

2. On January 22, 2016, Defendant Cisneros-Vasquez filed a Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct his Sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255.

3. On January 25, 2016, the Court issued a minute order indicating that "its decision-making would be aided by the filing of a response/opposition by the United States." (Dkt. 17). The Court set a deadline of Friday, March 11, 2016 for the United States' response/opposition.

4. The United States intends to file such a response/opposition, and I am currently researching and drafting such a document. However, schedule constraints have made it difficult to meet the Court's deadline. These constraints include the following:

5. The AUSA originally assigned to this matter departed for maternity leave the same week the Court issued its minute order, and her pending matters were reassigned. I entered an appearance in this matter on February 17, 2016.

6. From February 22-25, 2016, I traveled outside the state for an ongoing criminal investigation. petition, United States v. Neal, 1:11-CR-297. The § 2255 petition and supporting materials in Neal consisted of well over one hundred pages, and the Response required significant time to research, organize, and draft.

7. Given the above constraints, it will be difficult to file the United States' opposition by the original deadline. A three-week extension is sufficient to allow the United States to fully respond.

8. Accordingly, the United States requests that it be allowed to submit its response/opposition anytime on or before April 1, 2016.

I declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed this 7th day of March, 2016, at Fresno, California.

/s/Michael G. Tierney MICHAEL G. TIERNEY

ORDER

The Court having reviewed the United States' Motion for Extension of Time to Respond and the attached Declaration, hereby grants an extension of time to respond. The United States is ordered to respond no later than April 1, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer