Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Sandoval, 2:15-CR-00167 JAM. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20160316853 Visitors: 15
Filed: Mar. 15, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 15, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE, AND TO EXCLUDE TIME JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Benjamin Wagner, U.S. Attorney, through Samuel Wong, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, Heather Williams, Federal Defender, through Assistant Federal Defender Sean Riordan, attorney for Herber Sandoval, and Dina Santos, attorney for Manuel Montoya, that the status conference scheduled for March 15, 2016 be vacated and contin
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE, AND TO EXCLUDE TIME

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Benjamin Wagner, U.S. Attorney, through Samuel Wong, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, Heather Williams, Federal Defender, through Assistant Federal Defender Sean Riordan, attorney for Herber Sandoval, and Dina Santos, attorney for Manuel Montoya, that the status conference scheduled for March 15, 2016 be vacated and continued to April 5, 2016 at 9:15 a.m.

The reason for continuance is for continuing defense investigation and to allow the parties to discuss a potential resolution. Accordingly, the requested continuance is to allow counsel for Sandoval additional time to prepare Sandoval's defense, and allow Sandoval continuity of defense counsel.

Based upon the foregoing, the parties agree time under the Speedy Trial Act should be excluded as of March 14, 2016, the date of the parties' stipulation, through and including April 5, 2016, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161 (h)(7)(A)and (B)(iv)[reasonable time to prepare] and General Order 479, Local Code T4 based upon continuity of counsel and defense preparation.

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, the Court, having received, read, and considered the parties' stipulation, and good cause appearing therefrom, adopts the parties' stipulation in its entirety as its order. The Court specifically finds the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court finds the ends of justice are served by granting the requested continuance and outweigh the best interests of the public and defendants in a speedy trial.

The Court orders from the time of the parties' stipulation, March 14, 2016, up to and including April 5, 2016, shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this case must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and(B)(iv) [reasonable time for counsel to prepare and continuity of defense counsel] and General Order 479, (Local Code T4). It is further ordered the March 15, 2016 status conference shall be continued until April 5, 2016, at 9:15 a.m.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer