Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

UNITED FINANCIAL CASUALTY COMPANY v. BLACK DIAMOND ASPHALT, INC., 2:15-cv-02669-MCE-EFB. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20160331c89 Visitors: 2
Filed: Mar. 29, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 29, 2016
Summary: Stipulation to Continue Filing of Joint Status Report; Order Thereon MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr. , Chief District Judge . Recitals This is an insurance coverage matter. It arises out of a pending state court injury lawsuit in Sacramento Superior Court filed by Raymond Myers and Desiree Myers. Mr. Myers claims he was injured when he fell off a trailer allegedly manufactured or distributed by the defendants in the injury lawsuit. There are two affirmative pleadings in this case. Plaintiff/cros
More

Stipulation to Continue Filing of Joint Status Report; Order Thereon

Recitals

This is an insurance coverage matter. It arises out of a pending state court injury lawsuit in Sacramento Superior Court filed by Raymond Myers and Desiree Myers. Mr. Myers claims he was injured when he fell off a trailer allegedly manufactured or distributed by the defendants in the injury lawsuit.

There are two affirmative pleadings in this case. Plaintiff/cross-defendant United Financial Casualty Company ("UFCC") filed a complaint on December 24, 2015 (Dkt. 1). In the complaint, UFCC alleges causes of action for declaratory relief and damages in the form of reimbursement of defense costs in connection with its defense of its policyholder, defendant/cross claimant Black Diamond Asphalt, Inc. ("Black Diamond"). Each of the other defendants named in UFCC's complaint is a party to the pending state court injury lawsuit or a purported liability insurer of one or more of the defendants. UFCC included these as defendants to ensure that any judgment reached in this case is binding on each of the defendants. On February 16, 2016, Black Diamond filed a cross-claim against UFCC and defendant/cross-defendant Kinsale Insurance Company ("Kinsale") (Dkt. 8). Black Diamond alleges a cause of action of insurance bad faith against UFCC, causes of action for breach of contract and bad faith against Kinsale, and a cause of action for declaratory relief against UFCC and Kinsale.

The crux of this lawsuit on UFCC's complaint and Black Diamond's cross-claim is whether UFCC and/or Kinsale is obligated to defend or indemnify Black Diamond against the claims in the state court injury lawsuit under their respective insurance policies. That issue, and any potential damages flowing therefrom, has now been affected in part because Black Diamond has now been dismissed as a defendant in the state court injury action. The dismissal was filed by claimants' counsel in the injury action and submitted to the state court on or about March 21, 2016.

In light of the dismissal of Black Diamond in the state court injury action, UFCC, on March 23, 2016, filed a voluntary dismissal in this case pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1) dismissing defendants The Reed Leasing Group LLC, Raymond Myers and Desiree Myers, who had not filed answers to the complaint or motions for summary judgment.

In light of the dismissal of Black Diamond in the state court injury action, UFCC and defendants Polar Corporation and Polar Tank Trailer LLC will be filing a joint motion/stipulation to dismiss the complaint, without prejudice, against such defendants.

As a result of these actions, the remaining parties in this case will be UFCC, Black Diamond and Kinsale. The remaining parties are exploring a global resolution whereby both the complaint and Black Diamond's cross-claim would be dismissed, with prejudice. Black Diamond's counsel has advised that she does not have authority to agree to the proposed resolution at this time.

Under the current status, the parties who have appeared in the case were to prepare and submit a joint status report to the court by March 25, 2016. Given the recent events and streamlining of this case, and the potential resolution of the case within the next few weeks, UFCC, Black Diamond and Kinsale agree they do not wish to incur the time and expense to prepare the joint status report at this time if they will achieve the global resolution imminently.

Request for Continuance

Accordingly, the parties who have appeared in this action to date hereby stipulate to and request an order continuing the deadline to file a joint status report by no later than May 13, 2016.

Order

Based on the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, the court orders that the current deadline to file a joint status report is continued to May 13, 2016. The parties are to meet and confer and file the report by no later than May 13, 2016. All other provisions of the court's December 24, 2015 Order Requiring Joint Status Report (Dkt. 3) remain in force.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer