COUNTRY VISIONS, INC. v. MidSOUTH LLC, 2:15-cv-01740-TLN-CKD. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20160428857
Visitors: 8
Filed: Apr. 26, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 26, 2016
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING EXPERT WITNESS DISCLOSURE DEADLINES TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant Country Visions, Inc., Counter-Defendant Kenneth Petersen, and Defendant and Counter-Claimant MidSouth, LLC stipulate and agree as follows: The parties are currently engaged in fact discovery and are trying to informally resolve discovery disputes without resort to Court resources. In light of the status of fact discovery and to facilitate ongoing effo
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING EXPERT WITNESS DISCLOSURE DEADLINES TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant Country Visions, Inc., Counter-Defendant Kenneth Petersen, and Defendant and Counter-Claimant MidSouth, LLC stipulate and agree as follows: The parties are currently engaged in fact discovery and are trying to informally resolve discovery disputes without resort to Court resources. In light of the status of fact discovery and to facilitate ongoing effor..
More
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING EXPERT WITNESS DISCLOSURE DEADLINES
TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant Country Visions, Inc., Counter-Defendant Kenneth Petersen, and Defendant and Counter-Claimant MidSouth, LLC stipulate and agree as follows:
The parties are currently engaged in fact discovery and are trying to informally resolve discovery disputes without resort to Court resources. In light of the status of fact discovery and to facilitate ongoing efforts to informally resolve discovery disputes, it would serve the interests of efficiency and conserve the resources of the Court to extend the expert disclosure deadlines from the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order [Dkt. No. 22] approximately 90 days so the following deadlines apply:
September 9, 2016: deadline for each party to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2)(B) and (C)
October 10, 2016: deadline for any contradictory and/or rebuttal expert disclosures authorized under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2)(D)(ii).
All expert disclosures shall be served by email. Pursuant to Local Rule 144(b), the parties state that they have never sought or obtained an extension on these expert witness disclosure deadlines.
ORDER
Having considered the Joint Stipulation Extending Expert Witness Disclosure Deadlines, and for good cause shown, the Court HEREBY ORDERS that the expert disclosure deadlines from the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order [Dkt. No. 22] shall be extended so that the following deadlines shall apply:
September 9, 2016: deadline for each party to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2)(B) and (C).
October 10, 2016: deadline for any contradictory and/or rebuttal expert disclosures authorized under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2)(D)(ii).
All expert disclosures shall be served by email.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
