Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Gnibus v. Colvin, 2:15-CV-01669-AC. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20160429a03 Visitors: 12
Filed: Apr. 27, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 27, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR A SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that Defendant shall have an extension of time to May 4, 2016 to respond to Plaintiff's opening brief. The current due date is April 20, 2016. Defendant respectfully requests this additional time due to a heavy workload. Defendant's counsel just argued before the Ninth Circuit and is currently wor
More

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR A SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that Defendant shall have an extension of time to May 4, 2016 to respond to Plaintiff's opening brief. The current due date is April 20, 2016. Defendant respectfully requests this additional time due to a heavy workload. Defendant's counsel just argued before the Ninth Circuit and is currently working on a motion in another matter before the Ninth Circuit. In addition, Defendant's counsel is responsible for managing and briefing forty-eight other matters pending before the District Courts.

This request is made in good faith with no intention to unduly delay the proceedings.

The parties further stipulate that the Court's Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly.

Counsel apologizes to the Court for any inconvenience caused by this delay.

ORDER

APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer