U.S. v. McCarns, 2:08-CR-093 KJM (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20160503a27
Visitors: 6
Filed: May 02, 2016
Latest Update: May 02, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER MODIFYING PROTECTIVE ORDERS TO ALLOW SPECIFIED PROTECTED MATERIALS TO BE PUBLICLY FILED IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT'S REPLY TO GOVERNMENT'S OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL AFTER DEPOSITION OF TRIAL COUNSEL KIMBERLY J. MUELLER , District Judge . STIPULATION Plaintiff, United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendant, DOMONIC McCARNS, by and through his counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. This Court has previously ordered that
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER MODIFYING PROTECTIVE ORDERS TO ALLOW SPECIFIED PROTECTED MATERIALS TO BE PUBLICLY FILED IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT'S REPLY TO GOVERNMENT'S OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL AFTER DEPOSITION OF TRIAL COUNSEL KIMBERLY J. MUELLER , District Judge . STIPULATION Plaintiff, United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendant, DOMONIC McCARNS, by and through his counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. This Court has previously ordered that ..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER MODIFYING PROTECTIVE ORDERS TO ALLOW SPECIFIED PROTECTED MATERIALS TO BE PUBLICLY FILED IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT'S REPLY TO GOVERNMENT'S OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL AFTER DEPOSITION OF TRIAL COUNSEL
KIMBERLY J. MUELLER, District Judge.
STIPULATION
Plaintiff, United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendant, DOMONIC McCARNS, by and through his counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:
1. This Court has previously ordered that all discovery in cases 08-CR-093 and 08-CR-116 provided to, or made available to, defense counsel is subject to a protective order (Case 08-CR-093 KJM, Dkt. Nos.181 and 895; Case 08-CR-116 KJM, Dkt. Nos. 08-CR-116 KJM, Dkt. Nos. 64 and 491).
2. Consistent with this Court's previous order (Case No. 08-CR-116 KJM, Dkt. No. 728), protected documents cited in defendant's motion for new trial were redacted and filed on the public docket. However, defendant has also cited to protected documents in defendant's "Reply to Government's Opposition to Motion for New Trial after Deposition of Trial Counsel" (Case No. 08-CR-116 KJM, ECF No. 783) which are not covered by that previous order of the Court.
3. The parties stipulate and agree to modify the above-referenced protective orders to allow the protected documents cited in defendant McCarns' "Reply to Government's Opposition to Motion for New Trial After Deposition of Trial Counsel" (Case No. 08-CR-116 KJM, ECF No. 783) to be filed on the public docket as long as the documents are redacted pursuant to Local Rule 140.
IT IS SO STIPULATED:
DATED: April 27, 2016 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER,
United States Attorney,
/s/Michael Anderson
Michael Anderson
Assistant U.S. Attorney
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
