Gray v. Romero, 1:13-cv-01473-DLB PC. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20160504880
Visitors: 6
Filed: May 03, 2016
Latest Update: May 03, 2016
Summary: ORDER EXTENDING DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING ORDER TO DEFENDANTS LOADHOLT, MUNDUNURI AND ROMERO DENNIS L. BECK , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action. The action is proceeding on Plaintiff's Fourth Amended Complaint for violation of the Eighth Amendment against Defendants Romero, Comelli, Rebel, Ziomek, Mundunuri and Loadholt. On May 2, 2016, the Court issued a Discovery and Scheduling Order. At the time, only Defe
Summary: ORDER EXTENDING DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING ORDER TO DEFENDANTS LOADHOLT, MUNDUNURI AND ROMERO DENNIS L. BECK , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action. The action is proceeding on Plaintiff's Fourth Amended Complaint for violation of the Eighth Amendment against Defendants Romero, Comelli, Rebel, Ziomek, Mundunuri and Loadholt. On May 2, 2016, the Court issued a Discovery and Scheduling Order. At the time, only Defen..
More
ORDER EXTENDING DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING ORDER TO DEFENDANTS LOADHOLT, MUNDUNURI AND ROMERO
DENNIS L. BECK, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action. The action is proceeding on Plaintiff's Fourth Amended Complaint for violation of the Eighth Amendment against Defendants Romero, Comelli, Rebel, Ziomek, Mundunuri and Loadholt.
On May 2, 2016, the Court issued a Discovery and Scheduling Order. At the time, only Defendant Comelli had filed an answer.1
On May 3, 2016, Defendants Loadholt, Mundunuri and Romero filed an answer. Therefore, the Court EXTENDS the May 2, 2016, Discovery and Scheduling Order to these Defendants.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Defendant Rebel filed a motion to dismiss, which is pending. Defendant Ziomek has not yet appeared.
Source: Leagle
