Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Rogers v. Colvin, 2:15-cv-01574-EFB. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20160504931 Visitors: 11
Filed: May 02, 2016
Latest Update: May 02, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR DEFENDANT'S THIRD EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT EDMUND F. BRENNAN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Georgette Rogers ("Plaintiff") and Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security ("Defendant") (collectively, the "Parties"), by and through their respective counsel of record, that Defendant shall have a third extension of time of 14 days to respond to Plaintiff's motion for
More

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR DEFENDANT'S THIRD EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Georgette Rogers ("Plaintiff") and Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security ("Defendant") (collectively, the "Parties"), by and through their respective counsel of record, that Defendant shall have a third extension of time of 14 days to respond to Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and/or to file any cross-motions. The current due date is May 2, 2016 and the new deadline would be May 16, 2016. Defendant requires additional time so that she may continue to consider the possible settlement of the above-captioned matter without further briefing.

The parties further stipulate that the Court's Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly.

ORDER

Pursuant to stipulation, good cause appearing, IT IS SO ORDERED. Defendant shall file her response to Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on or before May 16, 2016. Plaintiff shall file any reply thereto on or before May 30, 2016.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer