Filed: May 03, 2016
Latest Update: May 03, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE; FINDING OF EXCLUDABLE TIME TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . STIPULATION Plaintiff, United States of America, through Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew Morris; and defendant Jeffrey Grady, through counsel Gregory W. Foster, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 1. A status conference is currently set for May 5, 2016 at 9:30 a.m. 2. By this stipulation, the above-named defendant now moves to continue the status conference to October 13, 2
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE; FINDING OF EXCLUDABLE TIME TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . STIPULATION Plaintiff, United States of America, through Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew Morris; and defendant Jeffrey Grady, through counsel Gregory W. Foster, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 1. A status conference is currently set for May 5, 2016 at 9:30 a.m. 2. By this stipulation, the above-named defendant now moves to continue the status conference to October 13, 20..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE; FINDING OF EXCLUDABLE TIME
TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.
STIPULATION
Plaintiff, United States of America, through Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew Morris; and defendant Jeffrey Grady, through counsel Gregory W. Foster, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
1. A status conference is currently set for May 5, 2016 at 9:30 a.m.
2. By this stipulation, the above-named defendant now moves to continue the status conference to October 13, 2016 at 9:30 a.m., and to exclude time between May 5, 2016 and October 13, 2016 under Local Code T4. Plaintiff does not oppose this request.
3. The basis upon which the parties agree to this proposed continuance of the status conference is as follows:
a. The government has provided defense counsel with the discovery associated with this case. All of this discovery has been either produced directly to counsel and/or made available for inspection and copying, and/or will be made available.
b. Counsel for defendant has been reviewing these materials, has begun discussing them with his client, and assessing potential trial and sentencing issues.
c. Defense counsel needs additional time, taking into account the exercise of due diligence, to review the materials described above and to discuss them with the defendant, and otherwise effectively prepare for the disposition of this case. Based on the Court's available calendars and the availability of defense counsel, the parties ask that the Court set this matter for a status conference on October 13, 2016, and that it find excludable time from May 5, 2016 to October 13, 2016 through and including the October 13, 2016 status conference.
d. Additionally, the defendant is currently in the process of being treated for a concerning medical issue. The details of that illness and treatment regime have been shared with the plaintiff. Defendant requests additional time to focus on this concerning medical issue and plaintiff does not object on that basis.
e. The parties stipulate that the ends of justice served by continuing the case and excluding time as requested outweigh the interest of the public and the defendant in a trial within the original date prescribed by the Speedy Trial Act.
4. Nothing in this stipulation and order shall preclude a finding that other provisions of the Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time periods are excludable from the period within which a trial must commence.
5. Finally, Gregory W. Foster has been authorized by all counsel to sign this stipulation on their behalf.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
