Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Ellison v. Farmer, 2:15-cv-1140 TLN CKD (PC). (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20160509689 Visitors: 6
Filed: May 06, 2016
Latest Update: May 06, 2016
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION, REQUEST TO SET CASE FOR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE, AND ORDER CAROLYN K. DELANEY , Magistrate Judge . Defendants F. Farmer and J. Pingol, along with Plaintiff Orlando Ellison, hereby submit this Joint Stipulation, Request to Set Case for Settlement Conference, and [Proposed] Order. Plaintiff and Defendants agree to the following: The Parties have been engaged in settlement discussions and strongly believe a Court ordered and supervised settlement conference would be of great
More

JOINT STIPULATION, REQUEST TO SET CASE FOR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE, AND ORDER

Defendants F. Farmer and J. Pingol, along with Plaintiff Orlando Ellison, hereby submit this Joint Stipulation, Request to Set Case for Settlement Conference, and [Proposed] Order. Plaintiff and Defendants agree to the following:

The Parties have been engaged in settlement discussions and strongly believe a Court ordered and supervised settlement conference would be of great benefit and likely resolve this matter.

In light of an upcoming settlement conference, the Parties agree to extend discovery due dates in order to save time and costs in the event settlement is achieved. The agreed upon due dates are as follows:

• Defendants' Requests for Admissions (Set One) propounded on Plaintiff, presently due May 12, 2016, now due 30 days after any unsuccessful settlement conference; • Plaintiff's Combined Discovery Requests (Set One) propounded on Defendant Pingol, presently due May 13, 2016, now due 30 days after any unsuccessful settlement conference; • Plaintiff's Combined Discovery Requests (Set One) propounded on Defendant Farmer (Set One), presently due May 13, 2016, now due 30 days after any unsuccessful settlement conference; • Plaintiff's Combined Discovery Requests (Set Two) propounded on Defendant Pingol, presently due May 27, 2016, now due 60 days after any unsuccessful settlement conference; • Plaintiff's Request for Production of Documents (Set One) propounded on Defendants, presently due May 27, 2016, now due 60 days after any unsuccessful settlement conference; and • Plaintiff's Request for Production of Documents (Set Two) propounded on Defendants, presently due June 3, 2016, now due 60 days after any unsuccessful settlement conference.

The Parties agree and stipulate that the above discovery due dates shall be extended by 30 and 60 days. The Parties also agree to submit this matter a settlement conference under the Court's supervision.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

Upon stipulation of the Parties and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter be set for a settlement conference. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the discovery response due dates shall be as follows:

• Defendants' Requests for Admissions (Set One) propounded on Plaintiff, presently due May 12, 2016, now due 30 days after any unsuccessful settlement conference/mediation; • Plaintiff's Combined Discovery Requests (Set One) propounded on Defendant Pingol, presently due May 13, 2016, now due 30 days after any unsuccessful settlement conference/mediation; • Plaintiff's Combined Discovery Requests (Set One) propounded on Defendant Farmer (Set One), presently due May 13, 2016, now due 30 days after any unsuccessful settlement conference/mediation; • Plaintiff's Combined Discovery Requests (Set Two) propounded on Defendant Pingol, presently due May 27, 2016, now due 60 days after any unsuccessful settlement conference/mediation; • Plaintiff's Request for Production of Documents (Set One) propounded on Defendants, presently due May 27, 2016, now due 60 days after any unsuccessful settlement conference/mediation; and • Plaintiff's Request for Production of Documents (Set Two) propounded on Defendants, presently due June 3, 2016, now due 60 days after any unsuccessful settlement conference/mediation. • The discovery deadline and deadline for the filing of pretrial motions are vacated. Those dates will be re-established, if necessary, at a later date.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer