Blasquez-Tracy v. Colvin, 2:15-CV-2621-CKD. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20160517759
Visitors: 13
Filed: May 16, 2016
Latest Update: May 16, 2016
Summary: UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME (FIRST REQUEST) CAROLYN K. DELANEY , Magistrate Judge . Defendant Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security ("Defendant") respectfully requests that the Court extend the time for Defendant to file her Answer to the Complaint, due on May 12, 2016, by 29 days, through and including June 10, 2016. An extension of time is needed in order to prepare Defendant's Answer because the Commissioner is still in the process of assembling and fin
Summary: UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME (FIRST REQUEST) CAROLYN K. DELANEY , Magistrate Judge . Defendant Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security ("Defendant") respectfully requests that the Court extend the time for Defendant to file her Answer to the Complaint, due on May 12, 2016, by 29 days, through and including June 10, 2016. An extension of time is needed in order to prepare Defendant's Answer because the Commissioner is still in the process of assembling and fina..
More
UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME (FIRST REQUEST)
CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge.
Defendant Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security ("Defendant") respectfully requests that the Court extend the time for Defendant to file her Answer to the Complaint, due on May 12, 2016, by 29 days, through and including June 10, 2016.
An extension of time is needed in order to prepare Defendant's Answer because the Commissioner is still in the process of assembling and finalizing the administrative record. This request is made in good faith with no intention to unduly delay the proceedings.
Counsel for Defendant conferred with Plaintiff's counsel's by email, who has no opposition to this motion on May 12, 2016.
The parties further stipulate the Court's Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly.
Counsel for Defendant apologizes to the Court and opposing counsel for any inconvenience caused by this delay.
ORDER
APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
