Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

JAY T. v. SACRAMENTO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, 2:16-cv-00136-MCE-AC. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20160518883 Visitors: 17
Filed: May 17, 2016
Latest Update: May 17, 2016
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION RE: BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE; ORDER THEREON MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. , District Judge . TO THE HONORABLE COURT: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between PLAINTIFFS Jay T. and Anne M.-T., individually, and as guardian ad litem for M.M.-T. ("Plaintiffs"), through their counsel of record, and DEFENDANT Sacramento City Unified School District ("District" and referred to with Plaintiffs as, "Parties"), through its counsel of record, as follows: 1. The Parties agree that di
More

JOINT STIPULATION RE: BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE; ORDER THEREON

TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between PLAINTIFFS Jay T. and Anne M.-T., individually, and as guardian ad litem for M.M.-T. ("Plaintiffs"), through their counsel of record, and DEFENDANT Sacramento City Unified School District ("District" and referred to with Plaintiffs as, "Parties"), through its counsel of record, as follows:

1. The Parties agree that discovery is unnecessary and inappropriate in this action;

2. The Parties agree that in terms of both causes of action in Plaintiffs' Complaint, the only issue before the Court is Plaintiffs' claim(s) for attorneys' fees;

3. The Parties agree that said cause of actions and claim(s) for attorneys' fees in Plaintiffs' Complaint should be appropriately resolved via the normal process of claiming and adjudication of claims for attorneys' fees, i.e., through a motion and briefing schedule and hearing;

4. The Parties therefore agree to the following briefing and hearing schedule for resolution of the merits of the causes of action and claim(s) for attorneys' fees in Plaintiffs' Complaint:

a. Plaintiffs' opening memorandum in support of an award of attorneys' fees (limited to 25 pages) and supporting papers, shall be filed on or before July 22, 2016; b. District's opposition memorandum (limited to 25 pages) and supporting papers shall be filed on or before August 19, 2016; c. Plaintiffs' reply memorandum (limited to 15 pages) and supporting papers shall be filed by no later than 14 days after the District's opposition memorandum is filed; and d. That a hearing be set for September 22, 2016 on the merits of the above motion papers/briefing, should the Court deem such a hearing necessary.

ORDER

Based upon the foregoing Stipulation between PLAINTIFFS Jay T. and Anne M.-T., individually, and as guardian ad litem for M.M.-T. ("Plaintiffs") and DEFENDANT Sacramento City Unified School District ("District"), and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE:

The Court hereby orders the following briefing and hearing schedule in this action:

1. Plaintiffs' opening memorandum in support of an award of attorneys' fees (limited to 25 pages) and supporting papers, shall be filed on or before July 22, 2016;

2. District's opposition memorandum (limited to 25 pages) and supporting papers shall be filed on or before August 19, 2016;

3. Plaintiffs' reply memorandum (limited to 15 pages) and supporting papers shall be filed by no later than 14 days after the District's opposition memorandum is filed; and

4. A hearing is set for September 22, 2016 at 2:00 p.m. on the merits of the motion.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer