Mattice v. Colvin, 1:15-cv-01791-JLT. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20160519a28
Visitors: 20
Filed: May 18, 2016
Latest Update: May 18, 2016
Summary: ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME NUNC PRO TUNC (Doc. 12) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . On May 13, 2016, the parties filed a stipulation for an extension of time for Plaintiff to serve a confidential letter brief. (Doc. 12) Notably, the Scheduling Order permits a single extension by the stipulation of parties (Doc. 5 at 4), and this is the first extension requested by either party. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS: 1. Plaintiff's request for an extension of time is GRANTED nun
Summary: ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME NUNC PRO TUNC (Doc. 12) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . On May 13, 2016, the parties filed a stipulation for an extension of time for Plaintiff to serve a confidential letter brief. (Doc. 12) Notably, the Scheduling Order permits a single extension by the stipulation of parties (Doc. 5 at 4), and this is the first extension requested by either party. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS: 1. Plaintiff's request for an extension of time is GRANTED nunc..
More
ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME NUNC PRO TUNC
(Doc. 12)
JENNIFER L. THURSTON, Magistrate Judge.
On May 13, 2016, the parties filed a stipulation for an extension of time for Plaintiff to serve a confidential letter brief. (Doc. 12) Notably, the Scheduling Order permits a single extension by the stipulation of parties (Doc. 5 at 4), and this is the first extension requested by either party. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS:
1. Plaintiff's request for an extension of time is GRANTED nunc pro tunc; and
2. Plaintiff SHALL serve a confidential letter brief no later than June 20, 2016.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
