Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

ROBINSON v. COUNTY OF SHASTA, 2:14-cv-02910-KJM-KJN. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20160520892 Visitors: 4
Filed: May 18, 2016
Latest Update: May 18, 2016
Summary: ORDER MODIFYING PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER KIMBERLY J. MUELLER , District Judge . The parties have stipulated and jointly requested a modification to the pretrial scheduling order regarding expert disclosure and the close of expert discovery. ECF No. 45. Good cause appearing, the court GRANTS the parties' stipulation. Accordingly, the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order filed November 25, 2015, ECF No. 40, is modified as follows: • Disclosure of expert witnesses shall be made no later than
More

ORDER MODIFYING PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER

The parties have stipulated and jointly requested a modification to the pretrial scheduling order regarding expert disclosure and the close of expert discovery. ECF No. 45. Good cause appearing, the court GRANTS the parties' stipulation. Accordingly, the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order filed November 25, 2015, ECF No. 40, is modified as follows:

• Disclosure of expert witnesses shall be made no later than August 3, 2016. • Supplemental disclosure as allowed by the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order filed November 25, 2016 may be made on or before August 17, 2016. • All expert discovery shall be completed by September 23, 2016. • In all other respects, the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order filed November 25, 2016, ECF No. 40, shall remain in full force and effect.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer