Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

KERSTEN v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD, 2:16-CV-0309-JAM-CMK. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20160520898 Visitors: 4
Filed: May 18, 2016
Latest Update: May 18, 2016
Summary: ORDER CRAIG M. KELLISON , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, who is proceeding with retained counsel, brings this civil action. At the time the action was filed, plaintiff was proceeding pro se and the matter was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 302(c)(21). Because plaintiff is now represented by counsel, the matter is referred back to the assigned District Judge. See id. The scheduling/status conference currently set for June 22, 2016, in Reddi
More

ORDER

Plaintiff, who is proceeding with retained counsel, brings this civil action. At the time the action was filed, plaintiff was proceeding pro se and the matter was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 302(c)(21). Because plaintiff is now represented by counsel, the matter is referred back to the assigned District Judge. See id. The scheduling/status conference currently set for June 22, 2016, in Redding, California, is hereby vacated.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer