Filed: May 19, 2016
Latest Update: May 19, 2016
Summary: AMENDED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE OF STATUS CONFERENCE GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. , District Judge . Plaintiff, United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendant, by and through his counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. By previous order, this matter was set for a Status Conference on May 20, 2016, at 9:00 a.m. 2. By this stipulation, defendant now moves to continue the Status Conference until June 17, 2016, at 9:00 a.m. an
Summary: AMENDED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE OF STATUS CONFERENCE GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. , District Judge . Plaintiff, United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendant, by and through his counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. By previous order, this matter was set for a Status Conference on May 20, 2016, at 9:00 a.m. 2. By this stipulation, defendant now moves to continue the Status Conference until June 17, 2016, at 9:00 a.m. and..
More
AMENDED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE OF STATUS CONFERENCE
GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR., District Judge.
Plaintiff, United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendant, by and through his counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:
1. By previous order, this matter was set for a Status Conference on May 20, 2016, at 9:00 a.m.
2. By this stipulation, defendant now moves to continue the Status Conference until June 17, 2016, at 9:00 a.m. and to exclude time between May 20, 2016, and June 17, 2016, under 18 U.S.C.§ 3161(h)(7)(A), B(iv). Plaintiff does not oppose this request.
3. The parties agree and stipulate, and request that the Court find the following:
a. Additional time is needed for investigations and review of an enormous amount of discovery.
b. The government does not object to the continuance.
c. Based on the above-stated findings, the ends of justice served by continuing the case as requested outweigh the interest of the public and the defendant in a trial within the original date prescribed by the Speedy Trial Act.
d. For the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, et seq., within which trial must commence, the time period of May 20, 2016, to June 17, 2016, inclusive, is deemed excludable pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 3161(h)(7)(A), B(iv) because it results from a continuance granted by the Court at defendant's request on the basis of the Court's finding that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.
4. Nothing in this stipulation and order shall preclude a finding that other provisions of the Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time periods are excludable from the period within which a trial must commence.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
For the reasons set forth above, the continuance requested by the parties is granted for good cause and time is excluded under the Speedy Trial Act from May 20, 2016, to, and including, June 17, 2016, based upon the Court's finding that the ends of justice outweigh the public's and defendant's interest in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(A).
IT IS ORDERED that the Status Conference currently scheduled for May 20, 2016, at 9:00 a.m. is continued to June 17, 2016, at 9:00 a.m.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
