Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Durbin v. Bonilla, 1:11-cv-01484-AWI-JLT (PC). (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20160523612 Visitors: 19
Filed: May 20, 2016
Latest Update: May 20, 2016
Summary: ORDER AFTER STATUS CONFERENCE JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . The Court held a status conference on May 20, 2016 regarding the agreement to settle the matter. (Doc. 131) Counsel agreed that assuming the District Judge adopts the findings and recommendations related to dismissing the case as to defendants Carmona and Flores and dismisses the matter as to defendants Barriga and Lopez—for their failure to keep the Court apprised of their current addresses—there is no further impedime
More

ORDER AFTER STATUS CONFERENCE

The Court held a status conference on May 20, 2016 regarding the agreement to settle the matter. (Doc. 131) Counsel agreed that assuming the District Judge adopts the findings and recommendations related to dismissing the case as to defendants Carmona and Flores and dismisses the matter as to defendants Barriga and Lopez—for their failure to keep the Court apprised of their current addresses—there is no further impediment to settlement. Thus, the Court ORDERS:

1. Defendants' counsel SHALL provide to Plaintiffs' counsel the proposed settlement agreement no later than June 3, 2016; . No later than June 10, 2016, Plaintiffs' counsel SHALL send copies of the agreement to each plaintiff and to obtain their signatures—formalizing their previous agreement to settle the case—as soon as possible; 3. No later than June 30, 2016, counsel SHALL file a joint report indicating the status of the settlement, specifically identifying which of the plaintiffs have signed the agreement and which signatures are outstanding, and identifying any impediments to settlement.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer